Have a new case or business transaction?

Call the Managing Partner, Stephen Fuller at 770.622.4700. ext. 106. The advice is good and the coffee is free.

In the news recently. After a three day trial, we obtained a successful verdict for our client in a hotly contested business litigation case in the Fulton County Superior Court. More... 

We were able to obtain a judgment in favor of our client in a case filed by an employee alleging FSLA and FCPA violations. More... 

We were able to obtain a reversal of a trial courts judgment in favor of a bank against a developer. More...  

We were able to obtain a judgment in favor of our developer client in a case filed by an adjacent property owner.    More... 

General Areas of Practice

Is the foreclosure crisis over? No. Housing pricing continue to plummet which is now starting to drastically affect commercial real estate. Once the bank refuses to renew loans and continue commitments, borrowers should be proactive.  More... 

Several new laws will be in effect in Georgia starting July 1, 2011. This will include requirements of employers to use everify. Broader interpretations on restrictive covenants. Stay in touch with our blog.                   More... 

Recent News

After a hotly contested business litigation case in the Fulton Superior Court, Stephen Fuller obtained a verdict in favor of our client. The Plaintiff, a doctor in Atlanta, sued our client, several employees and companies attempting to pierce the corporate veil from a failed restaurant operation. Even with audited financials, the Plaintiff persisted resulting in three day trial that ended with a winning verdict for the client and firm. For more on this case read here. (Case history read here).

Plaintiff sued restaurant operations alleging violation of the FSLA and the FCPA resulting from the employer honoring student loan garnishments. In a case of first impression before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, summary judgment was granted in favor of our client.  Court Opinion.

Developer was sued by the bank for a promissory note and interference with a security interest in the property. The developer had obtained a bank loan for property along with water and sewer taps. The developer resold the water and sewer taps. The bank brought litigation seeking damages. We were able to obtain a reversal of the trial courts judgment against the developer. Court Opinion.

Developer was sued by adjacent property owners for the failure to comply with restrictive covenants. We were able to win on summary judgment at trial proving that the covenants were not personal in nature and the adjacent owner could not hold the developer responsible after the property had been transferred. Court Opinion.


 Stephen P. Fuller, Attorney at Law